Rios v. Exeter District Ambulance, 1:18-cv-00034-DAD-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181127818
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 15, 16) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Jennifer Rios, has filed a request for dismissal of the action with prejudice (ECF No. 15), and Defendant Exeter District Ambulance have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF Nos. 16). In light of the request for dismissal (ECF No. 15), and because Defendant TJ Fischer has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismi
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 15, 16) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Jennifer Rios, has filed a request for dismissal of the action with prejudice (ECF No. 15), and Defendant Exeter District Ambulance have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF Nos. 16). In light of the request for dismissal (ECF No. 15), and because Defendant TJ Fischer has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismis..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 15, 16)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Jennifer Rios, has filed a request for dismissal of the action with prejudice (ECF No. 15), and Defendant Exeter District Ambulance have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF Nos. 16). In light of the request for dismissal (ECF No. 15), and because Defendant TJ Fischer has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant TJ Fischer. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). In light of the stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant Exeter District Ambulance (ECF No. 16), the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Exeter District Ambulance.
The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
