RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
The court has already found that these cases are related under Civil Local Rule 3-12:
As the number and potential complexity of these actions warrant holding a single, coordinated initial case management conference for all actions listed above, the court hereby orders as follows.
The court will be guided by the Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth ("MCL 4th"), approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States, as well as by the Civil Local Rules of Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ("the Civil Local Rules"), and this court's standing orders. Counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the MCL 4th, the Civil Local Rules, and this court's Standing Orders.
Prior to the initial case management conference and entry of a comprehensive order governing all further proceedings in this case, the provisions of this order shall govern the practice and procedure in: (1) the numbered cases listed above and (2) all cases later found related thereto filed in all divisions of the Northern District of California.
The court will hold an initial case management conference December 18, 2015 at 10:30 A.M. in Courtroom 6, Fourth Floor, 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95113.
Counsel shall to be prepared at the conference to suggest procedures that will facilitate the expeditious, economical, and just resolution of this litigation. The items listed in Civil Local Rule 16-9 (Case Management Statement and Proposed Order); the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California (Contents of Joint Case Management Statement); MCL 4th §§ 22.6 (Case-Management Orders), 22.61 (Initial Orders), 22.62 (Organization of Counsel), and 22.63 (Subsequent Case-Management Orders) shall, to the extent applicable, be a part of the agenda for the conference. In addition, specific items on the agenda shall include:
Counsel shall confer and seek consensus to the extent possible with respect to the above items on the agenda.
Counsel will submit to the court at least one week in advance of the initial CMC, a brief written statement indicating their preliminary understanding of the facts involved in the litigation and the critical factual and legal issues. In particular, the parties should highlight any potential factual or legal issues that are unique to their respective cases. These statements will not waive claims or defenses and may not be offered into evidence against a party.
If the parties have any suggestions as to any case management orders or additional agenda items, these suggestions shall be filed with the court by one week before the CMC.
Each party represented by counsel shall appear at the initial case management conference through the party's attorney, who will have full authority to act on behalf of the party in this litigation.
To minimize costs and facilitate a manageable conference, parties with similar interests may agree, to the extent practicable, to have an attending attorney represent the party's interest at the conference. A party will not, by designating an attorney to represent the party's interest at the conference, be precluded from other representation during the litigation, nor will attendance at the conference waive objections to jurisdiction, venue, or service.
Assuming that the related cases are consolidated, the court intends to appoint lead counsel for plaintiffs to conduct and coordinate the discovery stage of this litigation and, to the extent possible, pretrial motion practice.
The main criteria for lead counsel shall be:
Absent agreement of plaintiffs, the court contemplates that lead counsel will have the following responsibilities:
Reimbursement for costs and/or fees for services will be set at a time and in a manner established by the court after due notice to all counsel and after a hearing.
This case is subject to electronic case filing ("ECF") pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 of the United States District Court of the Northern District of California. Civil Local Rule 5-1(c) provides that "[e]ach attorney of record is obligated to become an ECF user and obtain a user ID and password for access to the system upon filing a case in this district." If he or she has not already done so, counsel shall register forthwith as an ECF User and be issued an ECF User ID and password. Forms and instructions can be found on the court's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cm-ecf. Service of all papers shall be made through ECF.
Defendants are granted an extension of time for responding by motion or answer to the complaints (and any consolidated amended complaint) until a date to be set by this court at the initial CMC.
In addition, pending the initial case management conference and further orders of this court, any outstanding discovery proceedings are stayed and no further discovery shall be initiated. The time requirements to perform any acts or file any papers pursuant to Rules 26 through 37, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, are tolled until the initial CMC at which time a discovery schedule will be established.
Finally, any pending motions must be re-noticed pursuant to a date set by further order of this court. The pending stipulations regarding waiver of service of summons and time to respond to the complaints
This order shall also apply to related cases later filed in this court.
All parties and their counsel are reminded of their duty to preserve evidence that may be relevant to this action. The joint case management statement should include a brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information ("ESI Guidelines"), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer.
In accordance with Rule 5(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, discovery requests and responses are not to be filed with the clerk, nor sent to the judge's chambers, except to the extent needed in connection with a motion.
Unless otherwise ordered by this court, all substantive communications with the court shall be in writing and e-filed. The court recognizes that cooperation by and among plaintiffs' counsel and by and among defendants' counsel is essential for the orderly and expeditious resolution of this litigation. The communication of information among and between plaintiffs' counsel and among and between defendants' counsel shall be not deemed a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the protection afforded attorneys' work product, and cooperative efforts contemplated above shall in no way be used against any plaintiff by any defendant or against any defendant by any plaintiff.
Nothing in this provision shall be construed to limit the rights of any party to assert the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine.