Fitbit Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company, 16-cv-06791-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180327d46
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having been informed that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this c
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having been informed that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this ca..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Having been informed that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
