PARKS v. U.S., C13-00001 EMC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140714571
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. THE PARTIES IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION HEREBY SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), plaintiff Lawanda Parks and defendant United States of America hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned action, including all claims that were asserted therein. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. [P
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. THE PARTIES IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION HEREBY SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), plaintiff Lawanda Parks and defendant United States of America hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned action, including all claims that were asserted therein. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. [PR..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
THE PARTIES IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION HEREBY SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING STIPULATION:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), plaintiff Lawanda Parks and defendant United States of America hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned action, including all claims that were asserted therein. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice is granted and this entire action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
