Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND TO REPLY TO ITS MOTION TO ENJOIN ROLLER CLUTCH FROM PROSECUTING CASE AGAINST DEFENDANT BEFORE THE EASTERN DISTRICT TO TEXAS (Second Request for Extension to Respond to Motion to Dismiss) (Third Request for Extension to Reply to Its Motion to Enjoin Roller Clutch) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff JS Produ
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND TO REPLY TO ITS MOTION TO ENJOIN ROLLER CLUTCH FROM PROSECUTING CASE AGAINST DEFENDANT BEFORE THE EASTERN DISTRICT TO TEXAS (Second Request for Extension to Respond to Motion to Dismiss) (Third Request for Extension to Reply to Its Motion to Enjoin Roller Clutch) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff JS Produc..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND TO REPLY TO ITS MOTION TO ENJOIN ROLLER CLUTCH FROM PROSECUTING CASE AGAINST DEFENDANT BEFORE THE EASTERN DISTRICT TO TEXAS
(Second Request for Extension to Respond to Motion to Dismiss)
(Third Request for Extension to Reply to Its Motion to Enjoin Roller Clutch)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff JS Products, Inc. ("JS Products" or "Plaintiff") has requested, and Defendant Roller Clutch Tools, LLC ("Roller Clutch" or "Defendant") has agreed to, a two week extension of time, until January 19, 2018, for Plaintiff to file its Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Improper Venue Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3). (ECF No. 30, "Motion"). This is the Parties' second request for an extension of the deadline to oppose the Motion. The Motion was originally filed on December 15, 2017 and the opposition is currently scheduled to be due on or before January 5, 2018.
Further, Defendant has also agreed to, a two week extension of time, until January 19, 2018, for Plaintiff to file its Reply to Its Motion to Enjoin Roller Clutch Tools, LLC from Prosecuting its Case Against Defendant before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. (ECF No. 07, "Motion"). This is the Parties' third request for an extension of the deadline to oppose the Motion. The Motion was originally filed on October 20, 2017, the Opposition (ECF No. 29, "Opposition") was filed December 15, 2017 and the Reply is currently scheduled to be due on or before January 5, 2018.
Good cause exists for this Court to grant the extension because the Parties have reached an agreement in principle that settles all matters in controversy between them. The Parties respectfully and jointly request that this Court grant the requested extension to allow the agreement to be finalized, settlement obligations to be met and a dismissal stipulation to be filed with the Court.
Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate that Plaintiff has until January 19, 2018 to file its Opposition to Defendant Roller Clutch's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and Improper Venue Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3); and to Reply to Its Motion to Enjoin Roller Clutch Tools, LLC from Prosecuting its Case Against the Defendant in the matter before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.