Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161220a34
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on nine separate Motions to Dismiss in the related cases listed above. On November 9, 2016, the parties submitted a Joint Statement addressing the Court's proposal to refer the cases to a Special Master. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC ("Plaintiff") consented to the appointment of a Special Master. (ECF No. 45 at 4.) However, Defendant Sylvia Mathews Burwell ("Defendant") did not consent
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on nine separate Motions to Dismiss in the related cases listed above. On November 9, 2016, the parties submitted a Joint Statement addressing the Court's proposal to refer the cases to a Special Master. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC ("Plaintiff") consented to the appointment of a Special Master. (ECF No. 45 at 4.) However, Defendant Sylvia Mathews Burwell ("Defendant") did not consent a..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on nine separate Motions to Dismiss in the related cases listed above. On November 9, 2016, the parties submitted a Joint Statement addressing the Court's proposal to refer the cases to a Special Master. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC ("Plaintiff") consented to the appointment of a Special Master. (ECF No. 45 at 4.) However, Defendant Sylvia Mathews Burwell ("Defendant") did not consent and instead recommended that the pending motions be sent to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 45 at 7.) The Court asked Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's suggestion and on December 15, 2016, Plaintiff agreed to submit the pending motions in all related cases to Magistrate Judge Newman. (ECF No. 49 at 5-6.) The Court hereby REFERS all pending Motions to Dismiss in the lead action and the related cases to Magistrate Judge Newman for Findings and Recommendations. Additionally, the Court ORDERS that all future motions to dismiss or motions to amend be noticed before Magistrate Judge Newman.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
