Filed: Mar. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONDUCTING CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant StarKist Co. ("Defendant" or "StarKist"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below: 1. On May 14, 2014, the Court entered a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 66) setting a non-expert discovery cut-off of April 1, 2015. 2. On February 23, 2015, a su
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONDUCTING CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant StarKist Co. ("Defendant" or "StarKist"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below: 1. On May 14, 2014, the Court entered a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 66) setting a non-expert discovery cut-off of April 1, 2015. 2. On February 23, 2015, a sub..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONDUCTING CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendant StarKist Co. ("Defendant" or "StarKist"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below:
1. On May 14, 2014, the Court entered a Case Management Order (Dkt. No. 66) setting a non-expert discovery cut-off of April 1, 2015.
2. On February 23, 2015, a subpoena for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition was served on the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ("NOAA").
3. Counsel for NOAA has requested that the deposition of the NOAA witness be held after April 1, 2015.
4. On March 19, 2015, a subpoena for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition was served on Bursor & Fisher, P.A.
5. Bursor & Fisher has indicated that it intends to move to quash the subpoena and has requested that the deposition be rescheduled to a later date to accommodate briefing of the motion to quash.
In order to accommodate the request of NOAA's counsel, and to permit briefing of the motion to quash on the Bursor & Fisher subpoena, counsel for the parties have conferred and have agreed that the two referenced depositions may be conducted after the April 1, 2015 non-expert discovery cut-off.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that the depositions of the Bursor & Fisher, P.A. witness and the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration witness may be conducted after the April 1, 2015 non-expert discovery cut-off.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
