Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CORBEL v. 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, C 16-02944 WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160729855 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of defendants' motion for an extension to respond to plaintiffs' complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants' deadline for responding to plaintiffs' complaint is on August 2, 2016. This motion should have been made sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to respond to plaintiffs' complaint
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR EXTENSION

The Court is in receipt of defendants' motion for an extension to respond to plaintiffs' complaint until thirty days after a ruling on the motion to transfer. Defendants' deadline for responding to plaintiffs' complaint is on August 2, 2016. This motion should have been made sooner. Regardless of whether the case is transferred, defendants will eventually need to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. There will be no waste in beginning that work. Given that the deadline is in less than a week, however, this order grants an additional two weeks for defendants to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. It is unwarranted to postpone work that will eventually need to be done. Defendants shall therefore respond to plaintiffs' complaint by August 15, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer