BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. LILITH GAMES (SHANGHAI) CO. LTD., 3:15-cv-04084-CRB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170208b26
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER DEFERRING CONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court DEFERS consideration of uCool's motion for Rule 11 sanctions (dkt. 126) until after it has ruled on its motion for partial summary judgment (dkt. 120). At that time the Court will, if it sees fit, set a hearing date and deadline for Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion for sanctions. The Court likewise DEFERS consideration of whether to refer the request for discovery sanctions to Ma
Summary: ORDER DEFERRING CONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The Court DEFERS consideration of uCool's motion for Rule 11 sanctions (dkt. 126) until after it has ruled on its motion for partial summary judgment (dkt. 120). At that time the Court will, if it sees fit, set a hearing date and deadline for Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion for sanctions. The Court likewise DEFERS consideration of whether to refer the request for discovery sanctions to Mag..
More
ORDER DEFERRING CONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The Court DEFERS consideration of uCool's motion for Rule 11 sanctions (dkt. 126) until after it has ruled on its motion for partial summary judgment (dkt. 120). At that time the Court will, if it sees fit, set a hearing date and deadline for Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion for sanctions. The Court likewise DEFERS consideration of whether to refer the request for discovery sanctions to Magistrate Judge Corley until that time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
