Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. YAO, 10-CR-00434 RMW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140902970
Filed: Jul. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION RE: TRANSCRIPT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCEEDING IN DISTRICT COURT AND ORDER RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. On June 23, 2014, appellant petitioner the Republic of the Cote d'Ivoire ("Cote d'Ivoire") filed a motion to correct the transcript of the summary judgment hearing. See Appellant's Motion for Correction of Record, filed June 23, 2014. Initially, the court reporter provided a transcript with certification. Id. Exhibit 1. After counsel for the Cote d'Ivoire suggested changes
More

STIPULATION RE: TRANSCRIPT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT PROCEEDING IN DISTRICT COURT AND ORDER

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

On June 23, 2014, appellant petitioner the Republic of the Cote d'Ivoire ("Cote d'Ivoire") filed a motion to correct the transcript of the summary judgment hearing. See Appellant's Motion for Correction of Record, filed June 23, 2014. Initially, the court reporter provided a transcript with certification. Id. Exhibit 1. After counsel for the Cote d'Ivoire suggested changes, the court reporter provided another transcript without certification. Id. Exhibit 3. Unable to obtain additional changes, the Cote d'Ivoire filed a motion for additional changes to Exhibit 3.

To resolve the Cote d'Ivoire's motion without further litigation, the parties agree to the following changes to Exhibit 3 to the Cote d'Ivoire's motion which is the transcript the court reporter provided to counsel for the Cote d'Ivoire by email on or about May 23, 2014:

1. Page 2, line 23: Change "the non moving party evidence" to "the non-moving party's evidence"; 2. Page 4, line 13: Change "government file" to "government's file"; 3. Page 6, line 13: Change "accounts" to "account"; 4. Page 6, line 20: Change the word "Antigua" to "Republic of"; 5. Page 8, line 10: Take out ". That"; 6. Page 8, line 11: Change "all the sudden" to "all of a sudden"; 7. Page 8, line 11: Change "there" to "this"; 8. Page 8, line 12: Take out the "." at the end of that line after the word "dismiss"; 9. Page 8, line 13: Change "," to "." before the words "It's not."; 10. Page 8, line 25: Change "Well, there was in" to "He says, well there was a"; 11. Page 9, line 17: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 12. Page 9, line 21: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 13. Page 9, line 24: Change "is no longer empowered. And is sufficiently corrupt, that is being charged before an international court" to "is no longer empowered, and is sufficiently corrupt, that it is being charged before an international court": 14. Page 10, line 1: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 15. Page 11, line 11: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 16. Page 11, line 24-25: Change "it was not that it was ultra vires" to "it was ultra vires"; 17. Page 12, line 3: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 18. Page 12, line 4: Change the word "minster" to "minister"; 19. Page 13, line 18: Change the word "undermind" to "undermine"; and 20. Page 14, line 21: Change the word "not" to "note".

In stipulating to the above changes, the parties submit that there are additional transcription errors which are difficult to correct because of the passage of time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer