U.S. v. Rite Aid Corporation, 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180927754
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . In its May 29, 2018 pretrial scheduling order, the court set initial discovery deadlines and directed the parties to submit "more refined proposal[s] for a motion to validate plaintiff's proposed statistical sampling methods, or an alternative proposal to such a motion." Order, ECF No. 128 at 5. The parties filed a joint objection to the scheduling order, Objs., ECF No. 130, and later filed dueling proposed schedules for a motion to validate pla
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . In its May 29, 2018 pretrial scheduling order, the court set initial discovery deadlines and directed the parties to submit "more refined proposal[s] for a motion to validate plaintiff's proposed statistical sampling methods, or an alternative proposal to such a motion." Order, ECF No. 128 at 5. The parties filed a joint objection to the scheduling order, Objs., ECF No. 130, and later filed dueling proposed schedules for a motion to validate plai..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
In its May 29, 2018 pretrial scheduling order, the court set initial discovery deadlines and directed the parties to submit "more refined proposal[s] for a motion to validate plaintiff's proposed statistical sampling methods, or an alternative proposal to such a motion." Order, ECF No. 128 at 5. The parties filed a joint objection to the scheduling order, Objs., ECF No. 130, and later filed dueling proposed schedules for a motion to validate plaintiff's proposed statistical sampling methods, Pls.' Proposal, ECF No. 131; Def.'s Proposal, ECF No. 132.
After considering the parties' joint objections to the scheduling order and separate proposed schedules for the validation motion, the court AMENDS the scheduling order as follows:
Event Current Date Amended Date
Plaintiffs' disclosure of sampling Earliest feasible point. 7/16/2018
methodology expert report and
materials
Defendant's Disclosure of Sampling N/A 12/15/2018
Methodology Expert Report and
Materials
Last Day to Depose Defendant's N/A 1/31/2019
Sampling Methodology and
Statistical Expert
Defendant's Motion Challenging N/A 2/1/2019
Plaintiffs' Sampling Methodology
and Design
Plaintiffs' Opposition Brief N/A 3/1/2019
Defendant's Reply Brief N/A 3/22/2019
Hearing on Motion N/A 4/5/2019 at 10:00 A.M. in
Courtroom No. 3
First Phase of Discovery Completed 1/25/2019 4/26/2019
Second Phase of Discovery 5/24/2019 8/23/2019
Completed
Expert Disclosures (other than 3/15/2019 9/23/2019
sampling methodology/design)
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures (other 4/18/2019 11/19/2019
than sampling methodology/design)
Expert Discovery Completed 5/24/2019 12/19/2019
Last Day to Hear Dispositive 7/12/2019 4/10/2020 at 10:00 A.M. in
Motions Courtroom No. 3.
Although this order assumes the parties have adhered to the dates agreed to in their joint objections, see Objs. at 2, the parties may notify the court of changed circumstances by filing a stipulation to further clarify or modify the scheduling order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
