Garcia v. Service Employees International Union, 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180907a96
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: Order [Docket No. 159] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion for protective order related to the depositions of Steven Ury, Carol Nieters, and April Verrett set for next week. Docket No. 159. As the motion relates to three separate depositions, this request is properly treated as three separate motions. Cf. Local Rule IC 2-2(b). The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to re-docket the motion three times, one for each of the above deponents. The Cou
Summary: Order [Docket No. 159] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion for protective order related to the depositions of Steven Ury, Carol Nieters, and April Verrett set for next week. Docket No. 159. As the motion relates to three separate depositions, this request is properly treated as three separate motions. Cf. Local Rule IC 2-2(b). The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to re-docket the motion three times, one for each of the above deponents. The Cour..
More
Order
[Docket No. 159]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion for protective order related to the depositions of Steven Ury, Carol Nieters, and April Verrett set for next week. Docket No. 159. As the motion relates to three separate depositions, this request is properly treated as three separate motions. Cf. Local Rule IC 2-2(b). The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to re-docket the motion three times, one for each of the above deponents. The Court hereby VACATES the depositions pending resolution of the motions for protective order.1 Responses to the motions shall be filed by September 11, 2018, and any replies to the motions shall be filed by September 13, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In the event the Court denies any of the motions and the discovery cutoff has expired, the Court will provide a reasonable time to complete the deposition(s). The Court expresses no opinion herein, however, as to the merits of the motions.
Source: Leagle
