Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

EISENHART v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, 4:15-cv-02522-YGR. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20151208b08 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(A)(1) YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Following settlement of this matter, Plaintiff SHARON EISENHART and Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, AND WACHOVIA CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The above-entitled action against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)( 1 ) of the Federal Rules o
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(A)(1)

Following settlement of this matter, Plaintiff SHARON EISENHART and Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, AND WACHOVIA CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The above-entitled action against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees except as otherwise agreed by the parties.

The parties request that the compliance hearing set for 9:01 a.m. on Friday, December 11, 2015 be taken off calendar without need for the parties to appear.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i) regarding signatures, Brent Dorian Brehm hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document and its content has been obtained by all signatories listed.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, Case No. 4:15-cv-02522-YGR is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in this matter except as otherwise agreed by the parties.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance hearing set for 9:01 a.m. on Friday, December 11, 2015 is taken off calendar. The parties need not appear.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer