Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Lenovo Adware Litigation, 15-md-02624-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180716825 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 163 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On December 9, 2016, Plaintiffs and Defendant Superfish filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement with Defendant Superfish. Dkt. No. 163. On July 11, 2018, the parties filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements, which requests "preliminary approval of the proposed Settlement Agreement with Defendant Superfish Inc. . . . and the proposed Settlement Agreement with
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Re: Dkt. No. 163

On December 9, 2016, Plaintiffs and Defendant Superfish filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement with Defendant Superfish. Dkt. No. 163. On July 11, 2018, the parties filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements, which requests "preliminary approval of the proposed Settlement Agreement with Defendant Superfish Inc. . . . and the proposed Settlement Agreement with Defendant Lenovo." Dkt. No. 230 at vii.

The Court ORDERS the parties to show cause why the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement with Defendant Superfish, Dkt. No. 163, should not be denied as moot in light of Docket Number 230. If the parties agree that Dkt. No. 163 should (or should not) be denied as moot, counsel must file a joint statement of two pages or less responding to this order to show cause by July 18, 2018. Otherwise, each party is required to file a statement of two pages or less setting out its position by that date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer