Rhee v. Gastelo, CV 18-5461-SJO (AGR). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191216792
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge. IT IS ORDERED that Grounds One, Three and Four are dismissed as unexhausted. The Respondent is ordered to file an answer to the Petiti
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge. IT IS ORDERED that Grounds One, Three and Four are dismissed as unexhausted. The Respondent is ordered to file an answer to the Petitio..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Grounds One, Three and Four are dismissed as unexhausted. The Respondent is ordered to file an answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus within 75 days after entry of this order.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
