Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Serna v. City of Bakersfield, 1:17-cv-1290 LJO JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190730a37 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 32) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On July 24, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating the above-captioned action is "dismissed in its entirety with prejudice." (Doc. 32 at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties signed the stipulation, it automatically
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 32)

On July 24, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation indicating the above-captioned action is "dismissed in its entirety with prejudice." (Doc. 32 at 2) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all parties signed the stipulation, it automatically terminate[d] the action. Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer