Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tye v. County of Los Angeles, 8:17-cv-01831-RGK-KES. (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181114b43 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, including the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 30) and the Amended Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which objections
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, including the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 30) and the Amended Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 35). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made (Dkt. 36). The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Los Angeles County's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 17) is GRANTED and Judgment will be entered:

1. Dismissing the claim for damages based on Santobello v. New York, the First Amended Complaint with prejudice; and

2. Dismissing all of the other claims in the First Amended Complaint without prejudice but without leave to amend.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer