Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND CONSENT [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on August 17, 2017 and their First Amended Complaint on April 12, 2018; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, the Court entered a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 10); WHEREAS, discovery commenced in December 2017; WHEREAS, the parties sought two previous modifications of the Scheduling Order: first, because discovery moved more slowly than ant
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND CONSENT [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on August 17, 2017 and their First Amended Complaint on April 12, 2018; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, the Court entered a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 10); WHEREAS, discovery commenced in December 2017; WHEREAS, the parties sought two previous modifications of the Scheduling Order: first, because discovery moved more slowly than anti..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND CONSENT [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on August 17, 2017 and their First Amended Complaint on April 12, 2018;
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, the Court entered a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 10);
WHEREAS, discovery commenced in December 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties sought two previous modifications of the Scheduling Order: first, because discovery moved more slowly than anticipated (ECF No. 20), and second, to allow the parties to explore settlement discussions, without litigation deadlines impeding the possibility of a settlement (ECF No. 24), both of which modifications the Corut granted (ECF Nos. 22, 25);
WHEREAS, the parties have made progress in settlement discussions, but agree that additional time is necessary to conclude such discussions, including, if the parties later agree, through Local Rule 271's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program; and
WHEREAS, this is the parties' third request for an extension of any deadline in the Court's Pre-Trial Scheudling Order (ECF No. 10);
THE PARTIES JOINTLY CONSENT TO and request that the Court enter an Order modifying certain dates in the Order Modifying the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 25), as follows:
Old Date New Date
Rule 26(a)(2) expert witness disclosures October 31, 2018 January 7, 2019
Rebuttal expert witness reports November 28, 2018 February 4, 2019
Completion of discovery January 7, 2019 March 7, 2019
Deadline to file dispositive motions February 4, 2019 April 4, 2019
Final pre-trial conference May 13, 2019 July 15, 2019
Trial July 16, 2019 September 16, 2019*
All other dates listed in the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 10) shall remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED. The dates are modified as follows:
1. Rule 26(a)(2) expert witness disclosures: January 7, 2019
2. Rebuttal expert witness reports: February 4, 2019
3. Completion of discovery: March 7, 2019
4. Deadline to file dispositive motions: April 4, 2019
5. Final pre-trial conference: July 22, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.
6. Jury Trial: September 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.
