Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MADRIGAL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, CV-14-04242 SS. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160613972 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT SUZANNE H. SEGAL , District Judge . This action came on regularly for jury trial on November 12, 2015, in Courtroom 590 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Suzanne H. Segal presiding. Arash Homampour of the Homampour Law Firm, P.C. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Carlos Madrigal. Warren J. Binder of Binder & Associates appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs Richard Tang and Anna Tang. Peter H. Klee and Theona Zhordania of Sheppard, Mu
More

JUDGMENT

This action came on regularly for jury trial on November 12, 2015, in Courtroom 590 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Suzanne H. Segal presiding. Arash Homampour of the Homampour Law Firm, P.C. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Carlos Madrigal. Warren J. Binder of Binder & Associates appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs Richard Tang and Anna Tang. Peter H. Klee and Theona Zhordania of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company.

A jury of eight persons was impaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and After hearing the evidence and arguments of the attorneys, and being instructed by the Court, the jury retired to consider its verdict.

On November 25, 2015, the jury answered the Special Verdict form, which the Court received, filed, and entered of record.

JUDGMENT

Based on the jury's verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Carlos Madrigal and against Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company as of April 8, 2016, nunc pro tunc, in the amount of $10,580,651.80 plus 10% interest rate pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §685.010(a) thereon from October 4, 2012 through April 8, 2016 in the amount of $3,716,272.77. 2. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Richard Tang and against Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company as of April 8, 2016, nunc pro tunc, in the amount of $50,000. 3. Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Anna Tang and against Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company as of April 8, 2016, nunc pro tunc, in the amount of $50,000. 4. The deadline for the parties to file a notice of appeal is June 17, 2016.

POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AND COSTS

Plaintiffs are entitled to recover post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 on the above amounts from April 8, 2016 until the date Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company pays the judgment. Plaintiffs may also pursue recovery of costs incurred in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and the Local Rules.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer