MARKS v. HOBBS, 5:11-cv-00306-KGB. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140603831
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 11) and the objections filed by petitioner Bernard Marks (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court's findings. Mr. Marks's petition is dismissed with p
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 11) and the objections filed by petitioner Bernard Marks (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court's findings. Mr. Marks's petition is dismissed with pr..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 11) and the objections filed by petitioner Bernard Marks (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court's findings.
Mr. Marks's petition is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment will be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Mr. Marks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
