Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kozlowski v. Bank of America, N.A., 1:18-cv-00131-DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181019i27 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ON THE DOCKET (ECF No. 78) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of her claims against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (ECF No. 78). Thus, the claims against said defendant have been dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 ,
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ON THE DOCKET (ECF No. 78)

On October 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of her claims against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (ECF No. 78). Thus, the claims against said defendant have been dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Bank of America, N.A. on the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer