MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, 2:13-cv-259-RSP. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20141226576
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is MTEL's Motion for Relief from Exclusion Order (Dkt. 69, the "Motion"). MTEL asks this Court to permit introduction of the "NFR" document that it failed to timely disclose. For the reasons set forth in the Court's prior rulings on this issue, MTEL's request is DENIED. (10/20 Tr. at 41:1-21; 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.) The Court notes, however, that it may revisit its ruling if Samsung opens the door to the topic. ( See, e.g., 1
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER ROY S. PAYNE, Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is MTEL's Motion for Relief from Exclusion Order (Dkt. 69, the "Motion"). MTEL asks this Court to permit introduction of the "NFR" document that it failed to timely disclose. For the reasons set forth in the Court's prior rulings on this issue, MTEL's request is DENIED. (10/20 Tr. at 41:1-21; 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.) The Court notes, however, that it may revisit its ruling if Samsung opens the door to the topic. ( See, e.g., 11..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ROY S. PAYNE, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is MTEL's Motion for Relief from Exclusion Order (Dkt. 69, the "Motion"). MTEL asks this Court to permit introduction of the "NFR" document that it failed to timely disclose. For the reasons set forth in the Court's prior rulings on this issue, MTEL's request is DENIED. (10/20 Tr. at 41:1-21; 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.) The Court notes, however, that it may revisit its ruling if Samsung opens the door to the topic. (See, e.g., 11/7 Tr. at 50:18-21.)
Source: Leagle
