Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. BLANK, 12-cv-05380-EDL. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121213b09 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION REQUESTING REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge. The undersigned parties appreciate the opportunity to participate in the Court's ADR multi-option program. The parties, however, agree that the above-captioned administrative review case is not amenable to an intermediate resolution at this time, none of the ADR processes are likely to lead to resolution of the case or deliver benefits sufficient to justify the re
More

STIPULATION REQUESTING REMOVAL FROM THE ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.

The undersigned parties appreciate the opportunity to participate in the Court's ADR multi-option program. The parties, however, agree that the above-captioned administrative review case is not amenable to an intermediate resolution at this time, none of the ADR processes are likely to lead to resolution of the case or deliver benefits sufficient to justify the resources consumed by its use, and the case should continue before the Court. See ADR Local Rule 3-5(e)(3). The parties therefore jointly stipulate and request, pursuant to ADR Local Rule 3-3(c) and Civ. Local Rule 7-12, that the Court remove the above-captioned case from its ADR multi-option program.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer