ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES, 11-7353. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140507c44
Visitors: 21
Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: May 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW this 6th day of May, 2014 upon consideration of Cerida Investment Corporation's motion to intervene, Dkt. No. 180, plaintiff Barbara Robertshaw's response thereto, Dkt. No. 190, Cerida's reply, Dkt. No. 191, Cerida's supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 208, and Robertshaw's reply to Cerida's supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 211, and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that Cerida's motion to intervene is DENIED.
ORDER
THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW this 6th day of May, 2014 upon consideration of Cerida Investment Corporation's motion to intervene, Dkt. No. 180, plaintiff Barbara Robertshaw's response thereto, Dkt. No. 190, Cerida's reply, Dkt. No. 191, Cerida's supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 208, and Robertshaw's reply to Cerida's supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 211, and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that Cerida's motion to intervene is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
