Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ogala v. Chevron Corp., 14-cv-00173-SC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140530a82 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: May 29, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Clerk's Notice Scheduling Case Management Conference on Reassignment (ECF No. 28), the Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for June 20, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., with the parties' joint case management statement due June 13, 2014; WHEREAS, pursuant to Rules 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are required to meet and c
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Clerk's Notice Scheduling Case Management Conference on Reassignment (ECF No. 28), the Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for June 20, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., with the parties' joint case management statement due June 13, 2014;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rules 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are required to meet and confer regarding the contents of the joint case management statement, initial disclosures and other issues by May 30, 2014, with initial disclosures due June 14, 2014;

WHEREAS, on May 19, 2014, the Court granted Defendants Chevron Corp.'s and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, and gave Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by June 18, 2014;

WHEREAS, at present, no operative complaint exists;

WHEREAS, the matters to be addressed in the parties' Rule 26(f) meet and confer, case management conference statement and initial disclosures depend substantially on the contours of an amended complaint and the extent to which the Court determines any such complaint survives a motion to dismiss;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT, pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 6-2, the Initial Case Management Conference and all associated deadlines, including the initial disclosures and the Rule 26(f) conference, shall be taken off calendar, to be rescheduled after the pleadings have been set and an answer has been filed.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Robert A. Mittelstaedt, attest that concurrence in filing this document has been obtained from the other signatory.

PURSUANT TO THE FORGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer