Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ZEICHNER v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 2:16-cv-00052-KJM-KJN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160505854 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 4) AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE MAY 12, 2016 STATUS CONFERENCE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Parties' stipulated request for a 30-day extension of time file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 4) is granted. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading on or before June 2, 2016. F
More

ORDER ON STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 4) AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE MAY 12, 2016 STATUS CONFERENCE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Parties' stipulated request for a 30-day extension of time file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 4) is granted. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading on or before June 2, 2016.

Further, good cause appearing, the Parties' stipulated request to continue the May 12, 2016 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is granted. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference is now set for the new firm date of July 7, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller in Courtroom 3, the Parties to confer as contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 25 and Local Rule 240(b) at least twenty-one (21) calendar days before the status conference is held. The Parties joint status report is due at least seven (7) days prior to the status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer