Duncan v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, 2:16-CV-293. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160503a49
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, pursuant to Local Rule 144, previously stipulated to a 12-day extension of time up to and including May 2, 2016 for Defendant to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties, by a Third Stipulation, agreed that Defendant be given an additional 14-day extension of time, up to and including May 16, 2016, to move or plead in respo
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, pursuant to Local Rule 144, previously stipulated to a 12-day extension of time up to and including May 2, 2016 for Defendant to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties, by a Third Stipulation, agreed that Defendant be given an additional 14-day extension of time, up to and including May 16, 2016, to move or plead in respon..
More
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, pursuant to Local Rule 144, previously stipulated to a 12-day extension of time up to and including May 2, 2016 for Defendant to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties, by a Third Stipulation, agreed that Defendant be given an additional 14-day extension of time, up to and including May 16, 2016, to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
Upon consideration of the Third Stipulation filed by the parties, Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to May 16, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
