Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Andersen Tax LLC v. Laffont-Reveilhac, 3:17-cv-01311-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180201a83
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff Andersen Tax LLC ("Plaintiff") and defendants St phane Laffont-R veilhac ("Laffont-R veilhac"), V ronique Martinez ("Martinez"), Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS ("AA&C") ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through undersigned counsel, reached a settlement in the above-captioned matter before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte, which the Parties placed on record on January 11, 2018. The terms of se
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Andersen Tax LLC ("Plaintiff") and defendants Stéphane Laffont-Réveilhac ("Laffont-Réveilhac"), Véronique Martinez ("Martinez"), Arthur Andersen & Co., SAS ("AA&C") ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through undersigned counsel, reached a settlement in the above-captioned matter before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte, which the Parties placed on record on January 11, 2018. The terms of settlement were subsequently confirmed in a confidential settlement agreement signed by the Parties.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all claims and counterclaims raised in this action by the Parties should be dismissed with prejudice with each of the Parties to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED. All days are vacated. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer