(PC) Williams v. DeLeon, 1:15-cv-00543-SKO (PC). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171121958
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Corey Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On October 31, 2017, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27.) On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed an answer to Defendants' Answer. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff does not have a right to file a response/surre
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Corey Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On October 31, 2017, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27.) On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed an answer to Defendants' Answer. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff does not have a right to file a response/surrep..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER
(Doc. 30)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Corey Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 31, 2017, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27.) On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed an answer to Defendants' Answer. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff does not have a right to file a response/surreply to Defendants' Answer under the Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Answer, filed on November 16, 2017, (Doc. 30), is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
