Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEL RIO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3:13-cv-03826-EMC]. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160627517 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JUNE 30, 2016 TO JULY 21, 2016 AND TO CONTINUE RELATED DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between the parties who have to date appeared in this action, through their counsel of record, Chris Hamner and Amy Wootton of the Hamner Law Offices, APC, attorneys for Plaintiffs Ricardo Del Rio, Jose Valdivia and Jose Pereira ("Plaintiffs"); and Robert G. Hulte
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JUNE 30, 2016 TO JULY 21, 2016 AND TO CONTINUE RELATED DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between the parties who have to date appeared in this action, through their counsel of record, Chris Hamner and Amy Wootton of the Hamner Law Offices, APC, attorneys for Plaintiffs Ricardo Del Rio, Jose Valdivia and Jose Pereira ("Plaintiffs"); and Robert G. Hulteng, Andrew M. Spurchise, and Rachael Lavi of Littler Mendelson, P.C., attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA, LLC ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), based upon the following recitals:

1. WHEREAS, on March 24, 2016, at the hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Court stayed Plaintiff's state claims pending the Price v. Uber Technologies, Inc. action proceeding in Los Angeles Superior Court and set a further case management conference for June 30, 2016;

2. WHEREAS, on June 2, 2016, the Court granted a temporary stay, staying this matter in its entirety. The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding the status of the case and the effect of the proposed settlement in O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Northern District Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC following the Court's order regarding preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, also before this Court, and submit a joint letter to the Court 10 days after the order is issued to provide the parties' position with respect to its impact on the case and whether the stay should continue or be lifted;

3. WHEREAS, as of filing of this stipulation, the Court has not submitted an order regarding the motion for preliminary approval in the O'Connor matter;

4. WHEREAS, a short continuance of the further case management conference would serve judicial economy as the Parties await the Court's order in regards to the motion for preliminary approval in the O'Connor matter.

STIPULATION

Parties hereby stipulate, agree and respectfully request that the case management conference currently scheduled for June 30 at 10:30 a.m. be continued to July 21, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. and that the current June 23, 2016 deadline to file a case management conference statement also be continued to July 14, 2016.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The case management conference currently scheduled for June 30 at 10:30 a.m. is continued to July 21, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. and the case management conference statement shall be due on July 14, 2016, seven (7) days in advance of the continued case management conference.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer