(PC) Simmons v. Hedgpeth, 1:07-cv-01058-DAD-SAB (PC). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171128768
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION FILED NOVEMBER 22, 2017 (ECF No. 243) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 22, 2017, Defendants Grissom, Keiley, Rients and St. Lucia filed a request for clarification regarding the Findings and Recommendations issued this same date. (ECF No. 243.) Defendants correctly point out that one port
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION FILED NOVEMBER 22, 2017 (ECF No. 243) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 22, 2017, Defendants Grissom, Keiley, Rients and St. Lucia filed a request for clarification regarding the Findings and Recommendations issued this same date. (ECF No. 243.) Defendants correctly point out that one porti..
More
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION FILED NOVEMBER 22, 2017
(ECF No. 243)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher I. Simmons is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 22, 2017, Defendants Grissom, Keiley, Rients and St. Lucia filed a request for clarification regarding the Findings and Recommendations issued this same date. (ECF No. 243.) Defendants correctly point out that one portion of the Findings and Recommendations incorrectly states that their motion for summary judgment should be denied, but the actual recommendation is to grant Defendants' motion. Accordingly, for purposes of clarification, the Findings and Recommendations, in its entirety, should recommend that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted.
Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant Akanno withheld pain medication from Plaintiff in retaliation for filing a grievance in October 2007 about his medical treatment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
