Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. FREEZE, 2:12-cv-2894 KJM KJN P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140604b15 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On April 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed March 17, 2014, denying plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY OR
More

ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

On April 7, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed March 17, 2014, denying plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 17, 2014, is affirmed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer