U.S. v. Solorio, CR 18-00129-MAG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180824a03
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION NATHANAEL COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The parties, through Counsel, stipulate that the status/change of plea hearing currently scheduled for August 21, 2018, may be continued to August 31, 2018. The reason for die requested continuance is so the parties may have sufficient time to reach a resolution in this case. The parties also jointly request that time be excluded under the S
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION NATHANAEL COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The parties, through Counsel, stipulate that the status/change of plea hearing currently scheduled for August 21, 2018, may be continued to August 31, 2018. The reason for die requested continuance is so the parties may have sufficient time to reach a resolution in this case. The parties also jointly request that time be excluded under the Sp..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION
NATHANAEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
The parties, through Counsel, stipulate that the status/change of plea hearing currently scheduled for August 21, 2018, may be continued to August 31, 2018. The reason for die requested continuance is so the parties may have sufficient time to reach a resolution in this case. The parties also jointly request that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between August 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018 so that counsel can conduct additional investigation, and negotiate a potential resolution in this matter.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. This matter is set before this Court for a change of plea hearing on August 31, 2018.
2. The time between August 21, 2018 and August 31, 2018 shall be excluded from the computation of time within which trial shall commence under the Speedy Trial Act, as failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense and Government counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See id. § 3161(11)(7)(A).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
