MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. DURAND, 2:15-cv-02704-JAM-KJN. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161122913
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOE DURAND TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant, Joe Durand, may have until December 6, 2016 to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to allow Defendant to obtain information necessary to file an Answer to the Complaint. This extension does not exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a). This is the first stipulati
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOE DURAND TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant, Joe Durand, may have until December 6, 2016 to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to allow Defendant to obtain information necessary to file an Answer to the Complaint. This extension does not exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a). This is the first stipulatio..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOE DURAND TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendant, Joe Durand, may have until December 6, 2016 to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to allow Defendant to obtain information necessary to file an Answer to the Complaint. This extension does not exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a). This is the first stipulation for an extension of time between the parties. Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), approval of this stipulation by the Court is not necessary.
Source: Leagle
