Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE TAHERIPOUR, 2:12-bk-30028-RK (2016)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California Number: inbco20160331901 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS TRUSTEE'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE ROBERT KWAN , Bankruptcy Judge . Pending before the court are the separate motions of Defendants Ebrahim Kahen-Kashani ("Mr. Kahen-Kashani"), ECF 124, Eric Herrera ("Mr. Herrera"), ECF 120, Donald S. Burris and Burris, Schoenberg and Walden, LLP (the "Burris Parties"), ECF 122, and Fariborz Beroukhim and Haleh Beroukhim (the "Beroukhims"), ECF 154 to dismiss the Third Amended Com
More

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS TRUSTEE'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

Pending before the court are the separate motions of Defendants Ebrahim Kahen-Kashani ("Mr. Kahen-Kashani"), ECF 124, Eric Herrera ("Mr. Herrera"), ECF 120, Donald S. Burris and Burris, Schoenberg and Walden, LLP (the "Burris Parties"), ECF 122, and Fariborz Beroukhim and Haleh Beroukhim (the "Beroukhims"), ECF 154 to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint of Plaintiff David A. Gill, the Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Debtor Mehrdad Taheripour.

For the reasons stated in the separately entered Memorandum Decision on the motions to dismiss, the court hereby orders as follows:

1. Mr. Herrera's Motion to Dismiss, ECF 120, the Burris Parties' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 122, Mr. Kahen-Kashani's Motion to Dismiss, ECF 124, and the Beroukhims' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 154, are GRANTED IN PART such that the second, fourth, fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh claims for relief in the Third Amended Complaint as against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Burris Parties' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 122, is GRANTED IN PART such that the third and twelfth claims for relief in the Third Amended Complaint as against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, but with leave to amend to assert claims for relief based on the conditions and limitations set forth in paragraph 5 herein. 3. Mr. Herrera's Motion to Dismiss, ECF 120, and Mr. Kahen-Kashani's Motion to Dismiss, ECF 124, are DENIED with respect to their requests to dismiss the third claim for relief in the Third Amended Complaint as against them. Recovery under the third claim for relief, if granted, shall be limited to the value that Mr. Herrera and Mr. Kahen-Kashani actually received from the alleged fraudulent transfer. 4. The Beroukhims' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 154, is GRANTED IN PART such that the twelfth claim for relief in the Third Amended Complaint as against them is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, but with leave to amend to assert a claim for injunctive relief as against these parties if there is an underlying claim in an amended complaint as provided in paragraph 6 herein to support a claim for injunctive relief. 5. Leave is granted for Plaintiff to serve and file an amended complaint within 30 days of entry of this order to allege claims upon which relief can be granted against the Burris Parties consistent with this order and the court's Memorandum Decision on the Motions, that is, for relief, if granted, to the value that such parties actually received from the alleged fraudulent transfer and for injunctive relief related to such claims. 6. Leave is granted for Plaintiff to serve and file an amended complaint within 30 days of entry of this order to allege claims upon which relief can be granted against the Beroukhims consistent with this order and the court's Memorandum Decision. 7. The court sets a status conference in this adversary proceeding on June 21, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, a joint status report must be filed on or before June 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer