Redding v. Prosight Specialty Management Company, 6:12-CV-00098-CCL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20190411841
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF CHARLES C. LOVELL , District Judge . Upon motion for miscellaneous relief filed by Petitioner Gary Zadick, co-counsel for New York Marine/Prosight, in the Redding v. Prosight, et al., USDC-MT, Case No. CR-12-98-H-CCL, for the unsealing of three sealed documents and production of the documents to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") pursuant to a Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice ("Commissi
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF CHARLES C. LOVELL , District Judge . Upon motion for miscellaneous relief filed by Petitioner Gary Zadick, co-counsel for New York Marine/Prosight, in the Redding v. Prosight, et al., USDC-MT, Case No. CR-12-98-H-CCL, for the unsealing of three sealed documents and production of the documents to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") pursuant to a Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice ("Commissio..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF
CHARLES C. LOVELL, District Judge.
Upon motion for miscellaneous relief filed by Petitioner Gary Zadick, co-counsel for New York Marine/Prosight, in the Redding v. Prosight, et al., USDC-MT, Case No. CR-12-98-H-CCL, for the unsealing of three sealed documents and production of the documents to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") pursuant to a Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by the Montana Supreme Court Commission on Practice ("Commission"), and it appearing that the documents are necessary for use in the formal disciplinary matter, In re: Brian Miller, Supreme Court Case No. PR 18-0139, ODC File No. 16-075. The sealed documents are described herein:
Doc. 133 Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Don Harris (with exhibits);
Doc. 141 Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Opinion of Don Harris;
Doc. 210 Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Don Harris.
The Court finds good cause and that judgment was entered long ago in the Redding matter; that the judgment has been satisfied; that NYM consents to the unsealing of documents; and the interest of justice exceeds the merits of continued sealing of the foregoing documents. Therefore:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Miscellaneous Relief is GRANTED:
1. Documents 133, 141 and 210 shall be unsealed for the limited purpose of producing the documents to ODC pursuant to the Commission's Subpoena Duces Tecum for use in the formal disciplinary proceeding, In re: Brian Miller, Montana Supreme Court Case No. PR 18-0139, ODC File No. 16-075;
2. Upon completion of the Miller matter, the documents shall be returned to the Clerk of the United States District Court within 60 days of final judgment entered by the Montana Supreme Court in the Miller matter, or conclusion by the Montana Commission on Practice.
Source: Leagle
