Filed: Feb. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Assurance Company of America's ("Assurance Company") fifteen Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 39-53). Assurance Company has filed fifteen separate Motions, when it should have filed a single motion setting forth all of its arguments regarding summary judgment. See Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., No. 2:11-CV-00043-MMD, 2012 WL 5378150, at *1 (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2012). Local Rule 7-4 pro
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Assurance Company of America's ("Assurance Company") fifteen Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 39-53). Assurance Company has filed fifteen separate Motions, when it should have filed a single motion setting forth all of its arguments regarding summary judgment. See Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., No. 2:11-CV-00043-MMD, 2012 WL 5378150, at *1 (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2012). Local Rule 7-4 prov..
More
ORDER
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Assurance Company of America's ("Assurance Company") fifteen Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 39-53). Assurance Company has filed fifteen separate Motions, when it should have filed a single motion setting forth all of its arguments regarding summary judgment. See Sherwin v. Infinity Auto Ins. Co., No. 2:11-CV-00043-MMD, 2012 WL 5378150, at *1 (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2012).
Local Rule 7-4 provides, "[P]oints and authorities in support of, or in response to, motions shall be limited to thirty (30) pages including the motion but excluding exhibits." D. Nev. R. 7-4. In apparent intentional defiance of Local Rule 7-4, Assurance Company's instant Motions total 275 pages, excluding attached exhibits and supporting affidavits. Therefore, the Court will deny the instant Motions without prejudice. See Sherwin, 2012 WL 5378150, at *1. The Court admonishes Assurance Company that it will not consider motions that fail to adhere to the requirements of Local Rule 7-4. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Assurance Company's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF Nos. 39-53), are DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Assurance Company's Motions, (ECF No. 54), is DENIED as moot.
