Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MABUTAS v. COLLEY, C14-3796 KAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160205927 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff ANTHONY MICHAEL MABUTAS, JR., and Defendants OFFICER JAMES COLLEY; ANTIOCH POLICE DEPARTMENT; and CITY OF ANTIOCH, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following: 1. WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint in the United Stated District Court in the Northern District of California on August 21, 2014, arising out of an inci
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff ANTHONY MICHAEL MABUTAS, JR., and Defendants OFFICER JAMES COLLEY; ANTIOCH POLICE DEPARTMENT; and CITY OF ANTIOCH, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following:

1. WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint in the United Stated District Court in the Northern District of California on August 21, 2014, arising out of an incident relating to the arrest of Plaintiff by an officer of the Antioch Police Department on June 9, 2014;

2. WHEREAS Plaintiff has a new and pending criminal case against him arising out of an April 14, 2015, incident pending in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. Plaintiff is being charged with the following crimes arising out of that arrest:

a. Count 1: Violation of Penal Code § 187 (a) (murder) i. with the enhancement of Criminal Street Gang under Penal Code § 186.22(b)(1) ii. with the enhancement of Intentionally Discharging Firearm in Designated Offense Penal Code § 12022.53 (b) (c) and (d) iii. with special allegation Murder Committed for Criminal Street Gang Purposes Penal Code § 190.2(a) (22)

3. WHEREAS it has previously been agreed that the outcome of the new pending criminal case against Plaintiff may have a direct and/or indirect bearing on the issues in this Fourth Amendment civil rights case.

4. WHEREAS with the exception of third party discovery, this matter is currently stayed until the underlying criminal case against Plaintiff is fully resolved.

5. WHEREAS this matter is currently set for a further Case Management Conference on April 5, 2016. However, the parties are informed that Plaintiff's trial date for the new pending criminal case is in August of 2016.

6. WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, respectfully seek an Order from the Court to continue the further Case Management Conference to September or October of 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and on a showing of good cause, the Court orders that the further Case Management Conference currently set for April 5, 2016, is hereby rescheduled to Ocotber 4, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. in the undersigned's Department. The parties October 4 shall file an Updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement no later than seven (7) days prior to the new Case Management Conference date. Should the new pending criminal case of Plaintiff be finally resolved before that time frame, the parties shall jointly provide notice to the Court as soon as feasible.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer