Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHILES v. PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, C-12-5796 MEJ. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130925a00 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows: WHEREAS, the discovery cut-off date set by the Case Management Order is October 8, 2013 WHEREAS, the expert disclosure cut-off date set by the Scheduling Order was September 13, 2013 1. Based on the progress of this Action, the parties stipulate to ex
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows:

WHEREAS, the discovery cut-off date set by the Case Management Order is October 8, 2013

WHEREAS, the expert disclosure cut-off date set by the Scheduling Order was September 13, 2013

1. Based on the progress of this Action, the parties stipulate to extend the discovery cut-off date from October 8, 2013 to November 8, 2013 and the time to disclose expert witnesses from September 13, 2013 to October 13, 2012.

2. The commencement of discovery in this matter was substantially delayed for several reasons.

3. Defendant's counsel did not notice the deposition of the plaintiff because the defense did not want to depose plaintiff before receiving documents and information based upon plaintiff's Rule 26 disclosure. Despite the defendant's timely compliance Plaintiff's counsel never did a Rule 26 disclosure, but responded to defendant's document request on June 5, 2013

4. Plaintiff's deposition — the only deposition that has taken place — was originally scheduled for June 10, 2013 The deposition, however, was canceled by plaintiff's counsel on the day it was set when plaintiff's counsel became ill. Due to scheduling conflicts — including a month-long jury trial — plaintiff's deposition did not occur until August 28, 2013

5. A one-month extension of time for discovery cut-off and disclosure of expert witnesses will enable both parties to timely and efficiently complete written discovery.

6. Since discovery had just barely commenced and the case was set to be mediated on September 25, 2013, expert disclosure was not possible since sufficient discovery had not been completed to determine necessary experts.

7. Based upon the scheduling and preparation of the case, good cause exists to extend the deadlines and further the one-month extension will not prejudice either party or result in undue delay.

8. For these reasons, and good cause appearing, the parties agree and stipulate to continue the time for discovery cut-off of October 8, 2013 to November 8, 2013 and the time to disclose expert witnesses from September 13, 2013 to October 13, 2013 All other dates remain as currently scheduled by the Case Management Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing;

IT IS SO ORDERED that:

The discovery cut-off period, previously set for October 8, 2013, is continued to November 8, 2013

The disclosure of expert witnesses, previously set for September 13, 2013, is continued to October 13, 2013

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer