Bateman v. United States, 1:19-CV-00869-DAD-SAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191202576
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS DOE DEFENDANTS AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) (ECF No. 13) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the Doe defendants from this action. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997). In light of the st
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS DOE DEFENDANTS AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) (ECF No. 13) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the Doe defendants from this action. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997). In light of the sti..
More
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS DOE DEFENDANTS AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)
(ECF No. 13)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the Doe defendants from this action. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). In light of the stipulation of the parties, the Doe defendants have been terminated in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
