Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation v. MD Labs, Inc., 3:18-cv-00006. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180417d06 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, undersigned Plaintiff and Defendant hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order extending the deadline for Plaintiff Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation ("Plaintiff") to file a Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Memorandum in Support, filed March 27
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, undersigned Plaintiff and Defendant hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order extending the deadline for Plaintiff Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation ("Plaintiff") to file a Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Memorandum in Support, filed March 27, 2018. See ECF No. 37 ("Motion to Dismiss"). Pursuant to this Stipulation, Defendant's counsel has agreed that Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 17, 2018 to file its Response.

The following is stated in support of this Stipulation:

1. On March 27, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 37.

2. The current deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss is April 10, 2018.

3. The undersigned Parties have agreed the deadline for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended until April 17, 2018.

4. This extension will not interfere with or delay the oral argument set for May 22, 2018 on this matter, because briefing will still be completed four weeks in advance of that hearing date. See ECF No. 39.

5. Additionally, no schedule has been set in this matter, and therefore this extension will not interfere with any scheduled dates.

Undersigned counsel for Plaintiff respectfully submits good cause exists and requests the Court grant the requested extension.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant request entry of an Order granting an extension for Plaintiff to file its Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss until and including April 17, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer