Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jackson v. Bick, 2:15-cv-2066 DB P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180402959 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendant Seabrooks filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff does not oppose the dismissal of defendant Seabrooks. (ECF No. 46 at 8.) By order dated March 19, 2018 the magistrate judge recommended defenda
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Defendant Seabrooks filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff does not oppose the dismissal of defendant Seabrooks. (ECF No. 46 at 8.) By order dated March 19, 2018 the magistrate judge recommended defendant Seabrooks' motion to dismiss be granted. (ECF No. 48.)

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 19, 2018, are adopted; and

2. Defendant Seabrooks is dismissed from this action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer