Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Lang, CR 12-00607 SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140514b21 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the status hearing date of May 14, 2014 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Hon. Donna M. Ryu, be vacated and re-set for July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., before the Oakland Duty Magistrate, for status. The requested continuance is necessary because defense coun
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ET. SEQ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the status hearing date of May 14, 2014 presently scheduled at 9:30 a.m., before the Hon. Donna M. Ryu, be vacated and re-set for July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., before the Oakland Duty Magistrate, for status.

The requested continuance is necessary because defense counsel is conducting ongoing investigation. Defense counsel has obtained records that are material and necessary to the defense, including five volumes of records from California juvenile courts, ten additional volumes of materials from Child Protective Services, and over 300 pages of records from Washington. Counsel is still in the process of reviewing the records. Once the review is completed, follow-investigation will be necessary. Additionally, defense counsel will be attending training out of state on the following dates: May 16, 2014; May 27-30, 2014; and June 9-13, 2014.

The parties agree and stipulate that the time until July 11, 2014 should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the bests interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts and continuity of counsel.

ORDER

The court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts and continuity of counsel. Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned matter is continued to July 11, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., before the Oakland Duty Magistrate. Time is excluded until July 11, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). No further continuances will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer