GIRALDES v. PORTER, 2:12-cv-662-KJM-EFB P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150511578
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 08, 2015
Latest Update: May 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . After this civil rights case was closed pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal following a settlement conference, see ECF No. 73, plaintiff sent the court two letters asking for help obtaining financial records from 2006-2008. 1 ECF Nos. 74, 75. On April 6, 2015, defendants filed copies of the requested financial records. ECF No. 79. Plaintiff's requests for documents, thus, appear to be moot and the Clerk shall terminate docket ent
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . After this civil rights case was closed pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal following a settlement conference, see ECF No. 73, plaintiff sent the court two letters asking for help obtaining financial records from 2006-2008. 1 ECF Nos. 74, 75. On April 6, 2015, defendants filed copies of the requested financial records. ECF No. 79. Plaintiff's requests for documents, thus, appear to be moot and the Clerk shall terminate docket entr..
More
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
After this civil rights case was closed pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal following a settlement conference, see ECF No. 73, plaintiff sent the court two letters asking for help obtaining financial records from 2006-2008.1 ECF Nos. 74, 75. On April 6, 2015, defendants filed copies of the requested financial records. ECF No. 79. Plaintiff's requests for documents, thus, appear to be moot and the Clerk shall terminate docket entry number 74. Regardless, the court takes no action on plaintiff's filings as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
So ordered.
FootNotes
1. The court initially construed plaintiff's filings as a motion to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement but upon further review, the filings instead appear to be a request for assistance in obtaining certain financial statements. See ECF No. 76.
Source: Leagle
