Villareal v. County of Fresno, 1:15-cv-01410-DAD-EPG (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190816881
Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 149) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 149), and finding that good cause exists for modifying the Amended Scheduling Order as requested by the parties, 1 IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Scheduling Order, entered on January 25, 2019 (ECF No. 141), is modified as follows: Event New Date or Deadline Nonexpert D
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 149) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 149), and finding that good cause exists for modifying the Amended Scheduling Order as requested by the parties, 1 IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Scheduling Order, entered on January 25, 2019 (ECF No. 141), is modified as follows: Event New Date or Deadline Nonexpert Di..
More
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER
(ECF No. 149)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 149), and finding that good cause exists for modifying the Amended Scheduling Order as requested by the parties,1
IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Scheduling Order, entered on January 25, 2019 (ECF No. 141), is modified as follows:
Event New Date or Deadline
Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff January 10, 2020
Expert Disclosure Deadline February 7, 2020
Rebuttal Expert Disclosure March 6, 2020
Expert Discovery Cutoff April 6, 2020
Dispositive Motion Deadline April 21, 2020
Motions for Attendance of Incarcerated November 11, 2020
Witnesses at Trial2
Oppositions to Motions for Attendance of December 11, 2020
Incarcerated Witnesses at Trial
Pretrial Conference January 11, 2021, at 1:30 p.m.
Trial March 16, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.
All other dates and deadlines remain as previously set.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The stipulation states that "[t]his is the first request for an extension of the deadlines requested by the parties." (ECF No. 149, p. 1). However, the Court has previously extended the deadlines in this case by approximately five months. (Compare ECF No. 127 with ECF No. 141).
2. If a party wants the Court to issue writs to secure the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial, that party must file a motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses.
3. The parties did not request modification of, and the Court is not modifying, the exhaustion motion filing deadline.
Source: Leagle
