(PC) Diaz v. Fox, 2:14-cv-2705 JAM CKD P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180117744
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion for terminating sanctions. (ECF No. 82.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 82) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the service of this order in which to file and serve an opposition. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days therea
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion for terminating sanctions. (ECF No. 82.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 82) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the service of this order in which to file and serve an opposition. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereaf..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion for terminating sanctions. (ECF No. 82.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 82) is granted; and
2. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the service of this order in which to file and serve an opposition. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.
Source: Leagle
