Pomponio v. Akal Foods, 2:19-CV-01158-TLN-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190809a45
Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER [Filed concurrently with Joint Stipulation to Continue Responsive Pleading] TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the responsive pleading for all Defendants be continued as follows: Current Schedule: • Defendant's Response: August 12, 2019 Modified Schedule: • Defendant's Response: September 10, 2019 Mr. Meiselas will notify counsel for Plaintiff whether he is representing Akal Foods within 10 days of this Order. IT IS
Summary: ORDER [Filed concurrently with Joint Stipulation to Continue Responsive Pleading] TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the responsive pleading for all Defendants be continued as follows: Current Schedule: • Defendant's Response: August 12, 2019 Modified Schedule: • Defendant's Response: September 10, 2019 Mr. Meiselas will notify counsel for Plaintiff whether he is representing Akal Foods within 10 days of this Order. IT IS S..
More
ORDER
[Filed concurrently with Joint Stipulation to Continue Responsive Pleading]
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the responsive pleading for all Defendants be continued as follows:
Current Schedule:
• Defendant's Response: August 12, 2019
Modified Schedule:
• Defendant's Response: September 10, 2019
Mr. Meiselas will notify counsel for Plaintiff whether he is representing Akal Foods within 10 days of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
