Unity Opto Technology Co. v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC, 5:18-CV-00076-FDW-DSC. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190403f52
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court following a hearing in this matter on April 2, 2019, whereby the Court, sua sponte, reconsidered its prior order denying Defendants' Second Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Asserted Patents (Doc. No. 65). For the reasons stated in open court, the Court reconsiders its ruling on the motion, GRANTS the motion (Doc. No. 65), and STAYS THE CASE. The parties are directed to file a jointly-prepared status
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court following a hearing in this matter on April 2, 2019, whereby the Court, sua sponte, reconsidered its prior order denying Defendants' Second Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Asserted Patents (Doc. No. 65). For the reasons stated in open court, the Court reconsiders its ruling on the motion, GRANTS the motion (Doc. No. 65), and STAYS THE CASE. The parties are directed to file a jointly-prepared status ..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court following a hearing in this matter on April 2, 2019, whereby the Court, sua sponte, reconsidered its prior order denying Defendants' Second Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of the Asserted Patents (Doc. No. 65). For the reasons stated in open court, the Court reconsiders its ruling on the motion, GRANTS the motion (Doc. No. 65), and STAYS THE CASE. The parties are directed to file a jointly-prepared status report every 90 days from the date of this Order so that the Court may be informed as to the status of the Reexamination of the Asserted Patents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
