Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Prothena Corporation PLC Securities Litigation, 1:18-cv-06425-ALC. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191209590 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing on December 2, 2019 (the "Settlement Hearing") on Co-Lead Counsel's motion for an award of attorneys' fees and payment of litigation expenses. The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing and otherwise; and it appearing that notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was mailed to all Settlem
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES

WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing on December 2, 2019 (the "Settlement Hearing") on Co-Lead Counsel's motion for an award of attorneys' fees and payment of litigation expenses. The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the Settlement Hearing and otherwise; and it appearing that notice of the Settlement Hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was mailed to all Settlement Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort, and that a summary notice of the hearing substantially in the form approved by the Court was published in Investor's Business Daily and transmitted over PR Newswire pursuant to the specifications of the Court; and the Court having considered and determined the fairness and reasonableness of the award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses requested,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of August 26, 2019 (the "Stipulation"), and all capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.

2. The Court has jurisdiction to enter this Order and over the subject matter of the Action and all Parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members.

3. Notice of Co-Lead Counsel's motion for an award of attorneys' fees and payment of litigation expenses was given to all Settlement Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. The form and method of notifying the Settlement Class of the motion for an award of attorneys' fees and payment of litigation expenses satisfied the notice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and Section 21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7), as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.

4. There have been no objections to Co-Lead Counsel's request for attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.

5. Co-Lead Counsel are hereby awarded, on behalf of all Plaintiffs' Counsel, attorneys' fees in the amount of $4,725,000, plus interest at the same rate earned by the Settlement Fund (i.e., 30% of the Settlement Fund) and $112,468.23 in payment of litigation expenses, plus accrued interest, which sums the Court finds to be fair and reasonable. Co-Lead Counsel shall allocate the attorneys' fees awarded amongst Plaintiffs' Counsel.

6. In making this award of attorneys' fees and expenses to be paid from the Settlement Fund, the Court has considered and found that:

(a) The Settlement has created a fund of $15,750,000 in cash that has been paid into escrow pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation, and that numerous Settlement Class Members who submit acceptable Claim Forms will benefit from the Settlement that occurred because of the efforts of counsel;

(b) The fee sought by Co-Lead Counsel has been reviewed and approved as reasonable by Lead Plaintiffs, sophisticated investors that oversaw the prosecution and resolution of the Action;

(c) 28,970 copies of the Notice were mailed to potential Settlement Class Members and nominees stating that Co-Lead Counsel would apply for attorneys' fees in an amount not to exceed 30% of the Settlement Fund and litigation expenses in an amount not to exceed $175,000;

(d) The Action raised a number of complex issues;

(e) Had Co-Lead Counsel not achieved the Settlement there would remain a significant risk that Lead Plaintiffs and the other members of the Settlement Class may have recovered less or nothing from Defendants;

(f) Plaintiffs' Counsel conducted the litigation and achieved the Settlement with skill, perseverance, and diligent advocacy;

(g) The amount of attorneys' fees awarded and litigation expenses to be paid from the Settlement Fund are fair and reasonable and consistent with awards in similar cases;

(h) Public policy concerns favor the award of attorneys' fees and expenses in securities class action litigation; and

(i) Plaintiffs' Counsel expended 3,064.25 hours, with a lodestar value of $1,766,167.75, to achieve the Settlement.

7. Any appeal or any challenge affecting this Court's approval regarding any attorneys' fees and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect the finality of the Judgment.

8. Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the Parties and the Settlement Class Members for all matters relating to this Action, including the administration, interpretation, effectuation, or enforcement of the Stipulation and this Order.

9. In the event that the Settlement is terminated or the Effective Date of the Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by the Stipulation.

10. There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order, and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer