Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: FINAL REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE AND JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . On December 7, 2018, this matter came before the Court on Petition on Probation and Supervised Release originally filed on December 4, 2018. Government counsel, Benedetto Balding, the defendant and his appointed Deputy Federal Public Defender attorney, Kim Savo, were present. The U.S. Probation Officer, Jennifer Soliz, was also present. The defendant admitted to the allegations, in violation of his s
Summary: FINAL REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE AND JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . On December 7, 2018, this matter came before the Court on Petition on Probation and Supervised Release originally filed on December 4, 2018. Government counsel, Benedetto Balding, the defendant and his appointed Deputy Federal Public Defender attorney, Kim Savo, were present. The U.S. Probation Officer, Jennifer Soliz, was also present. The defendant admitted to the allegations, in violation of his su..
More
FINAL REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE AND JUDGMENT
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.
On December 7, 2018, this matter came before the Court on Petition on Probation and Supervised Release originally filed on December 4, 2018. Government counsel, Benedetto Balding, the defendant and his appointed Deputy Federal Public Defender attorney, Kim Savo, were present. The U.S. Probation Officer, Jennifer Soliz, was also present.
The defendant admitted to the allegations, in violation of his supervised release, as stated in the Petition filed on December 4, 2018. The Court finds that the defendant is in violation of the terms and conditions of his supervised release imposed on July 29, 2015, July 19, 2018, and October 16, 2018.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, upon the findings of the Court and the Court having considered defendant's participation in treatment to date, the Court ORDERS defendant supervised release shall remain in effect continue under the same terms and conditions previously imposed, with the additional revised or modified conditions:
• Defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the United States Probation and Pretrial Services Office and General Order 18-10; and
• Unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or any other acceptable reasons, the defendant must maintain gainful employment. If employed for less than 20 hours per week, the defendant is to provide proof to the probation officer that he is applying for additional employment and/or is attending a schooling program.
